Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky’s claim that targeting key infrastructure “that generates revenue for Russia’s war” smells like a strategic diversion, and it should make any critical thinker raise an eyebrow. While Zelensky’s message may seem righteous on the surface, it’s time to scrutinize what the mainstream media—yes, I’m looking at you, CNN and MSNBC—are glossing over. These outlets are quick to champion every one of Ukraine’s moves while painting them as the infallible underdog, but let’s not pretend that they’re objective. This is about narratives, not facts.

In stark contrast, networks like Fox News have been more transparent in discussing the potential consequences of such strategies. They remind audiences that targeting Russian revenue can escalate tensions to uncontrollable heights—although sometimes they slip into sensationalism themselves. Still, the fact remains: at least they attempt to bring a critical lens to the discussion, unlike the echo chambers of the liberal media that lean into emotionally-charged narratives.

The real kicker? While corporate media pushes for increased military support—often under the guise of moral righteousness—they largely ignore the complex web of geopolitical ramifications. Are we really willing to double down on war without considering the fallout on both sides? Americans deserve factual information, not just the palatable version molded for clicks and ratings.