Karim Khan’s outright denial of allegations regarding an improper sexual relationship with a junior ICC staffer should drive us to ask: what does “mainstream media” really want us to believe? Outfits like CNN and the BBC will undoubtedly spin this into a scandal dripping with sensationalism, focusing on his position to paint the picture of a predatory elite. But let’s cut through the noise. Khan’s claims are not just unsubstantiated gossip; they challenge the narrative that anyone in a powerful position is automatically guilty until proven innocent.

Meanwhile, outlets such as The Guardian will surely jump at any chance to frame Khan as the villain, a classic move in today’s victimhood Olympics. This isn’t just about Khan defending himself; it’s about whether we allow our news sources to dictate guilt based solely on allegations rather than facts. The corporate media thrives on these stories, churning out outrage and perpetuating a culture of mistrust, rather than approaching the matter with nuance.

If Khan is to be vilified, let it be based on solid evidence not mere accusations or emotionally charged headlines meant to generate clicks. The public deserves better than a media environment that treats allegations as gospel merely to satisfy an audience eager for drama but unwilling to dissect the truth. In this case, let’s reserve judgment and consider the broader implications of such a quick-to-judge environment perpetuated by the establishment.