New data has emerged that should send shockwaves through our education systems and the tech-obsessed media chambers. According to these findings, certain university degrees yield fabulous financial returns, while others have the economic viability of a soggy cardboard box. We need to ask ourselves, why is corporate media—looking at you, CNN and NBC—pushing degrees that lead to financial ruin, when the numbers show we may be shepherding an entire generation toward a lifetime of student debt? What’s more absurd is how they gloss over the financial ruin tied to degrees in arts and humanities, while showering praise on fields like engineering and computer sciences.
Fox News might highlight that the average engineering grad can expect a lifetime yield that makes Wall Street traders look like they’re playing with Monopoly money. Meanwhile, the same networks that cheerlead for broad-stroke college education seem utterly indifferent to data showing psychology and philosophy majors can expect earnings that barely top fast-food wages. This is the narrative clash we need to tackle: why is investing in certain majors being framed as the “responsible choice,” while others are dismissed as risks? It reeks of elitism—a way to keep the elite, well-heeled insiders in their circles, while pushing everyone else into a financial minefield.
If we really cared about students’ futures, we wouldn’t shy away from such blunt and necessary conversations. Instead, many are left mandating an irrelevant diploma chase, all for what? To line the pockets of universities that clearly prioritize their bottom line over the prosperity and success of their students. Let’s call a spade a spade: the current educational landscape is a racket with nearly 1.7 trillion reasons to shout about it.
Leave a Reply