In the latest clash in the Israeli-Palestinian saga, Palestinians claim they were attacked by settlers, while the Israeli military spins a flashy narrative of a “Palestinian thief” who allegedly stole a weapon and opened fire on hikers. Sound familiar? That’s the playbook from corporate media, folks—diverging narratives that serve an establishment agenda. CNN, BBC, and other so-called reputable outlets are quick to pick sides, often steering the narrative to either victimhood or aggression depending on the political winds of the day.

The framing is copious! CNN exacerbates tensions by focusing on the military’s claims, leaving out critical context about settler violence which is a well-established pattern. On the flip side, BBC’s tone can vacillate, sometimes portraying Palestinians as mere aggressors without digging into the daily indignities they face. It’s as if they’re trying to create a neat little box, making it easier for viewers to swallow a complex issue without nuance.

Both outlets ignore a crucial question: who benefits from this disinformation? Settler violence rarely makes the headlines, and the civilians on both sides suffer as a result. Instead of uplifting the truth, they stick to their narratives—pushing us to choose a side rather than fostering understanding. And let’s get real; this isn’t just reporting; it’s an intricate game of political chess, and citizens are the pawns.