Did you catch the corporate media spin on Didier Deschamps’ farewell after France’s clash with England? Outlets like ESPN and BBC are practically sobbing over his departure, framing it as though we’re losing a football messiah instead of a well-compensated coach. They want you to believe the world is ending, all while glossing over the immense privilege and pressure of such positions. Deschamps led France to glory in 2018, but let’s not forget the handpicked, star-studded squad he had at his disposal—it’s not like he was coaching with a bunch of amateurs!

And how predictable is it that the same outlets celebrated every time he pushed a narrative that served their interests? Now they cling to his legacy as if the sun sets and rises on his decisions. You can bet the likes of CNN and The Guardian will spin this farewell into an emotional saga, completely ignoring that sometimes, it’s just time for a change. Media love to romanticize these narratives while conveniently ignoring the fact that coaching is a cutthroat, results-oriented business. They won’t mention how often he could have done better by adjusting strategies or incorporating fresh talent.

Look, I’m not saying Deschamps didn’t accomplish great things, but let’s not turn his departure into a hero’s saga. Every narrative needs a hero and a villain, and right now, the media has chosen their hero. The question is, who will they demonize next to uphold their melodrama?