Here we go again. The tragic death of actor James Handy should be a time for reflection, yet as the Medical Examiner’s report wades into the murky waters of a violent altercation, corporate media can’t resist the urge to sensationalize. Networks like CNN and TMZ are everything but restrained—painting a picture that effectively turns a grieving situation into tabloid fodder. Why is it that the mainstream can’t approach a man’s death with the dignity it deserves?

Instead of an informative narrative, we get a drama-filled retelling of the incident between Handy and his girlfriend’s son, Michael Gledhill. The reporting spins a grotesque tale, focusing on the altercation rather than the broader issues at play. Who benefits from this? Certainly not Handy’s family. Media outlets thrive on clicks and views, prioritizing sensationalism over sensitivity. They’re feeding off tragedy like vultures. If you think this is about honoring the actor’s life, think again. It’s about clicks and advertising revenue.

Worse still, it’s part of a larger pattern. Fox News, CNN, and the like consistently churn out narratives that cater to ‘breaking news’ junkies. They exploit personal tragedies as if they were just another episode of reality TV. How many times do we have to witness the same dance as they cover celebrity misfortune while glossing over more significant societal concerns?

The bottom line? Corporate media isn’t interested in providing context or truth; they’re in the business of shock and awe. It’s high time we start calling this behavior out and demanding better from those who claim to inform us.