Here’s a real kicker: fifteen women got appointed when only six female candidates made the cut from regional electoral colleges. It’s like a bad magic trick where the audience is supposed to believe the sleight-of-hand was all above board. With such obvious discrepancies, how is mainstream media—looking at you, CNN and MSNBC—not screaming foul play instead of cheerleading for diversity?

Fox News, on the other hand, is only half-heartedly calling this out, instead acting like it’s a progressive win without any scrutiny. Why aren’t they digging into how this process was arguably rigged to inflate numbers at the behest of some political agenda? They’d rather fawn over what looks good on paper than investigate what’s rotten beneath the surface.

Let’s be real: this isn’t just a simple appointment process; it’s a blatant signal that we’re far more concerned with ticking boxes than with actual merit. So when voters see fifteen women, it’s easy to get swept up in the feel-good narrative without daring to question the quality of leadership they’re really being handed. The corporate media wants everyone to put on blinders and give a hearty applause to the “progress” while the underlying issues fester away.

This isn’t simply about gender representation; it’s about accountability and integrity. It’s about time someone in the media starts asking the hard questions and exposing the truth, rather than letting themselves be paraded around as part of the establishment’s old circus show.