Jordan’s interception of 10 Iranian missiles is the kind of headline that should make us sit up and take notice, but what are we actually seeing from CNN, MSNBC, and the rest of the mainstream media? They’re too busy spinning this into their usual anti-Trump, pro-globalist narratives. When did a foreign missile attack on an ally become a footnote in a larger “Trump bad, Biden good” story? It’s transparently clear they’d rather focus on nonsense than let facts speak for themselves.

Look, Fox News might pick up the missile interception and frame it as “Protecting Democracy,” while conveniently ignoring how previous administrations have paved the way for Iran’s aggressive tactics. It’s as if they only want to spotlight the issue selectively to fit their audience’s narrative. So are we really supposed to believe there’s consensus on how to handle this crisis when everyone is more interested in their ratings than the truth?

And let’s talk about the elephant in the room—the Obama administration’s ill-fated nuclear deal that emboldened Iran. This is not just a current crisis; it’s a legacy issue. But good luck finding an outlet brave enough to connect those dots. While the media feeds us clickbait, the real story of national security gets drowned out. Bottom line: It’s crucial to question who benefits from the narratives being spun, because the truth is likely buried under a mountain of political posturing. A foreign attack shouldn’t be an opportunity for a partisan tug-of-war—it should be a wake-up call.